Aim: To explore the involvement of older people in the joint review of the NSF for Older People in England.
Methods: A day-long seminar was held with the user researchers and other members ofthe research team to capture their reflections on the user involvement in this large-scale study.
Findings: The older researchers reported on the personal benefits of working on this project and how valuable they had found it learning from other members of the team.
One of the main learning points from the project, however, was the importance of viewing service user researchers as an integral part of a wider team. Often service users are perceived as simply lacking experience and requiring training. This training is seen as crucial to maintaining quality standards in research. However, all individuals, whether they are researchers or service users, will have very different skills and experiences. It is important to allow everyone in a research team to be matched to tasks accordingly. It is also important to think about supporting the research team as a whole aiming to maximise the benefits from the diversity of skills and experiences available. This is distinct from trying to convert service users into academic researchers. The authors conclude there is a need to move beyond the rhetoric of participation and any blanket assumptions about what it means to be a 'service user researcher' or a 'professional researcher'. This means ensuring that within any research team there are equal opportunities for individual appraisal, support and personal or professional development, at the same time as ensuring there are clear lines of accountability.
External link: The following links will take you to information on this entry on an external website. INVOLVE is not responsible for the content or the reliability of the external websites. Link to abstract
Related entry: none currently available
Categories: health public health social care impact on service users involved impact of public involvement reflecting on public involvement in research journal article
Date Entered: 2010/09/28
Date Edited: 2012/11/21