Putting it into Practice

Title: A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers’ and patients’ interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials
Author: Dudley, L., Gamble, C., Allam, A., Bell, P., Buck, D., Goodare, H., Hanley, B., Preston, J., Walker, A., Williamson, P. and Young, B.
Date Published: 2015
Reference: Trials, 16: 190
Are service users or carers authors: No/Not Known

Abstract: Aim: To explore researchers’ and patient and public involvement (PPI) contributors’ views on training for PPI in clinical trials to inform the design of training for both parties. Methods: Interviews with researchers and PPI contributors working on clinical trials between 2006 and 2010. The contributors had been involved in oversight or management roles, rather than contributing to carrying out the research. Findings/ recommendations: There was little support for training PPI contributors. ‘Training’ for PPI contributors is often understood to mean ‘training in research methods’ and there was widespread concern that this might lead to contributors losing their patient perspective. The authors comment that training could in fact focus on how to maintain a patient perspective while being involved. Not all PPI contributors received formal training and many concluded that what is more important is a proper induction. The authors suggest inductions would benefit from being more structured and allowing PPI contributors to negotiate their roles with researchers. Researchers concluded that it was more important to find the ‘right’ contributor who already has the relevant skills and experience for a given role, than to provide training. This raises concerns about how to achieve diversity amongst PPI contributors. The authors suggest that it is important to think about the different ways in which PPI contributors can get involved in clinical trials. They recommend using more than one approach in order to benefit from different patient perspectives. Although some people questioned what training in PPI for researchers would cover, there was more support for this training overall. The authors suggest that as some PPI contributors aren’t clear about their role, training that helps both researchers and PPI to learn about ‘how to do PPI’ would be beneficial, especially if this enabled them to learn from each other. The authors conclude that we need to reconsider how training is conceptualised, designed and promoted. We also need to find ways to provide flexible, learning opportunities that reflect researchers’ and PPI contributors’ needs and preferences.

External link: The following links will take you to information on this entry on an external website. INVOLVE is not responsible for the content or the reliability of the external websites. Click here

Related entry: none currently available

Categories: journal article
service users and carers
research commissioners
relevant to all service users
lessons from direct experience of involvement
training and supporting service users
staff in research organisations

Date Entered: 2015/07/06

Date Edited: 2015/07/06

Additional Info: