Abstract: The BMJ and Research Involvement and Engagement are the first journals to routinely include patients and the public in the peer review process of journal articles. This article reports the findings from a survey that explored the perspectives and early experiences of these reviewers.
The survey was sent to patients and the public, some of whom had previously reviewed an article and some of whom had registered with the journals, but had not yet completed a review.
Reviewers described being motivated to review by the opportunity to include the patient voice in the research process, influence the quality of the biomedical literature and ensure it meets the needs of patients. They were keen to have access to more online resources and training to improve their reviewing skills. Suggestions on how to improve the reviewing experience included: allowing more time to review; better and more frequent communication; a more user-friendly process; improving guidance on how to review including videos; improving the matching of papers to reviewers’ experience; providing more varied sample reviews and brief feedback on the usefulness of reviews; developing a sense of community among reviewers; and publicising of the contribution that patient and public review brings.
External link: The following links will take you to information on this entry on an external website. INVOLVE is not responsible for the content or the reliability of the external websites. Click here
Related entry: none currently available
Categories: journal article relevant to all service users lessons from direct experience of involvement writing up and disseminating evaluating
Date Entered: 2018/11/12
Date Edited: 2018/11/12