Search results
Found 12 results.
Searching for: Titles starting with B
Biobanking from the patient perspective
Mitchell, D., Geissler, J., Parry-Jones, A., Keulen, H., Schmitt, D., Vavassori, R. and Matharoo-Ball, B.
Research Involvement and Engagement, 1, 4
Added: 30 July 2015
Broadening public participation in systematic reviews: a case example involving young people in two configurative reviews
Oliver, K., Rees, R., Brady, L., Kavanagh, J., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J.
Research Synthesis Methods, 6(2), 206-17
Added: 30 July 2015
But is it a question worth asking? A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers’ ideas being abandoned.
Boote, J., Dalgleish, M., Freman, J., Jones, Z., Miles, M. & Rodgers, H.
Health Expectations advance e-publication
Added: 20 June 2012
Beyond our expectations: A report of the experiences of involving service users in forensic mental health research
Faulkner, A.
London: National Programme for Forensic Mental Health R&D
Added: 26 March 2012
Becoming involved in research: a service user research advisory group.
Cotterell, P., Clarke, P., Cowdrey, D., Kapp, J., Paine, M. & Wynn, R.
Chapter 11. In: Creative Engagement in Palliative Care, (Eds: Jarrett,L.), Radcliffe
Added: 28 September 2010
Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation.
Shah, S. & Robinson, I.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23(1), 131-137.
Added: 28 September 2010
Blue skies in the Journal of Mental Health? Consumers in research.
Wykes, T.
Journal of Mental Health, 12(1), 1-6.
Added: 28 January 2009
Brief encounter: Collaborative research between academic researchers and older researchers.
Miller, E., Morrison, J. & Cook. A.
Generations Review, 16(3/4), 39-41.
Added: 28 January 2009
Briefing Paper: Using lay reviewers in the peer review process.
Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC)
London: AMRC.
Added: 21 February 2007
