Abstract: There have been repeated calls to better involve patients and the public and to place them at the centre of healthcare. Despite this supportive policy context, progress to achieve greater involvement is patchy and slow and often concentrated at the lowest levels of involvement.
The authors carried out a selective literature search guided by their broad expertise, covering a range of disciplines across health and social care, policy and research.
They found that patients and the wider public can be involved at most stages of healthcare, and this can have a number of benefits. Uncertainty persists about why and how to do involvement well, how to evaluate its impact, how to involve and support a diversity of individuals in ways that allow them to genuinely influence decision-making. This exposes patient and public involvement (PPI) to criticisms of exclusivity and tokenism.
Current models of PPI are too narrow, and few organisations mention empowerment or address equality and diversity in their involvement strategies. These aspects of involvement should receive greater attention, as well as the adoption of approaches that enable power and decision-making to be shared more equitably with patients and the public in designing, planning and co-producing healthcare.
External link: The following links will take you to information on this entry on an external website. INVOLVE is not responsible for the content or the reliability of the external websites. Click here
Related entry: none currently available
Categories: nature and extent of public involvement in research reflecting on public involvement in research journal article
Date Entered: 2019/01/18
Date Edited: 2019/01/18