Evidence Library

image_pdfimage_print

Title: Patient engagement in research: A systematic review
Author: Domecq, J., Prutsky, G., Elraiyah, T. et al
Date Published: 2014
Reference: BMC Health Services Research, 14, 89
Are service users or carers authors: No/Not Known

Abstract: Aim: To answer the following questions: (1) What is the best way to identify patient representatives? (2) How to engage them in designing and conducting research. (3) What are the observed benefits of patient engagement? (4) What are the harms and barriers of patient engagement? Methods: A literature review. Findings/ recommendations: 142 studies were reviewed. There were no particular methods recommended in the literature for either recruitment of patients or their engagement. The benefits were found to be: higher recruitment and retention rates; help with securing funding; improving research design; choosing relevant outcomes; helping with dissemination. The harms and barriers were found to be the need for extra time and funding, and concerns about engagement being tokenistic.

External link: The following links will take you to information on this entry on an external website. INVOLVE is not responsible for the content or the reliability of the external websites. Click here

Related entry: none currently available

Categories: health
public health
social care
Designing research
Writing up and disseminating
impact on research
impact on researchers
impact of public involvement
journal article
Recruitment

Date Entered: 2015/04/27

Date Edited: 2015/04/27

Additional Info: