Reviewing funding applications: An example of tangible patient involvement at the proposal stage

2014 Conference

Abstract: Biomedical Research Unit (BRU) patient representatives designed a template form enabling them to review research proposals in a standardised format. The form follows a traffic light system (TLS) to indicate whether the research should be funded or not (red, amber, green). Prior to submitting applications, researchers discuss their project with a patient representative using the form to guide discussions in terms of aims/objectives, impact, methodologies and patient involvement. The patient grades the proposal according to the TLS and provides feedback comments for the peer review panel.

The Respiratory BRU has been using the TLS forms for three years, for pump priming applications. Pump priming funding is available for those wanting to gather pilot data for early phase, translational research. The BRU has made it mandatory for all applicants to speak with a BRU patient representative prior to submission. Any application that has not involved a patient representative, or receives a negative score (red), is automatically rejected by the peer review committee. By implementing this system the BRU is actively ensuring that the research it funds is centred around patient need.

Download poster